Skip to content

Notes from the capital committee

Long-form essays on how capital decisions actually go wrong — and the quantitative habits that fix them. Written from the data: post-mortems, benchmark studies, and the patterns we see running live allocations. No gated PDFs, no lead forms. Just the essays.

Ranking Is Not Sizing

Every capital process ranks its options. Almost none sizes them — and the sizing is where the money is won or lost.

Coming soonSizing

The Bad Year Decides the Plan

Base cases are for approval documents. Commitments should be sized by the year everything goes wrong at once.

Coming soonDownside

Bets That Fail Together

Your projects share suppliers, regulators, labor pools, and a commodity price. Your capital plan pretends they don't.

Coming soonCorrelation

The Deferral Illusion: What Skipped Maintenance Really Costs

Deferring maintenance looks free in the year you defer it. The bill arrives compounded, and usually in the worst year.

Coming soonMaintenance

Why 20 Small Projects Beat 2 Mega-Projects

Diversification isn't just for stock portfolios. The same arithmetic decides which capital books survive a bad year.

7 min readDiversification

The Phase 2 Trap: Where $37B Disappears Every Year

The expansion decision is systematically mis-sized — funded on the strength of a first phase that told you very little.

8 min readExpansion

About these essays

These essays are written by the team that builds the engine, from the same research that calibrates it. We publish the findings openly because the industry's capital discipline problem is bigger than our customer list — and because readers who argue with us make the work better. Data sources and methodology notes are linked at the end of each piece.

The Capvium research team

If an essay described a problem on your desk

The fastest next step is a working session: your portfolio, our engine, one afternoon.